My thoughts on the automotive chapter 11 cases, on Forbes.com.
UPDATE: The materials for today's TARP Congressional Oversight Panel hearing on the automotive bankruptcies, including my full remarks, can be found here.
8934 items (5904 unread) in 34 feeds
LEGAL DISCLAIMER:
Content contained on or made available through the Web site is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed. By using the blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created. The accuracy, completeness, adequacy or currency of the Content is not warranted or guaranteed. The opinions expressed at or through the blog are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney and do not reflect those of the ABI. Your use of information on the Web site or materials linked from the Web site is at your own risk.
My thoughts on the automotive chapter 11 cases, on Forbes.com.
UPDATE: The materials for today's TARP Congressional Oversight Panel hearing on the automotive bankruptcies, including my full remarks, can be found here.
Wow. I missed this one last week. New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has brought civil and criminal charges against lawyers and process servers who were abusing the debt collection system. From the New York Times article:
According to a lawsuit filed on Tuesday in New York Supreme Court in Buffalo, lawyers and debt collectors obtained more than 101,000 court orders that were improperly issued, allowing them to seize, on average, $5,474 from each consumer.The cornerstones of due process are notice and a hearing. It sounds like these consumers were only getting half of that, and without notice that it is going to occur, the hearing does not do much good. From the press release, it sounds like the problem was with the process servers who are alleged to have knowingly failed to serve process. After serving process, the process server files an affidavit swearing that it was done. A false affidavit is akin to perjury, hence the criminal charges against some participants.
Hat tip to Brian Wolfman and Jeff Sovern over at the Consumer Law & Policy Blog for pointing the way to the story.