<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ABI Bankruptcy Blog Exchange &#187; In The (Red) Business Bankruptcy Blog &#187; June 22, 2009</title>
	<link>http://blogs.abiworld.org/</link>
	<description>ABI Bankruptcy Blog Exchange &#187; In The (Red) Business Bankruptcy Blog &#187; June 22, 2009</description>
	<generator>Gregarius 0.5.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<item>
		<title>In The (Red) Business Bankruptcy Blog: Section 363 Sales And Beyond: An M&amp;A Lawyer's Perspective On Purchasing Assets From Distressed Companies</title>
		<link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/BusinessBankruptcyBlog/~3/iGJSEWbZcXk/</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:40:10 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/BusinessBankruptcyBlog/~3/iGJSEWbZcXk/</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>With the economy suffering through the longest recession since the 1930s, it's little wonder that much of the merger and acquisition (&quot;M&amp;A&quot;) activity these days has been focused on distressed companies. The Chrysler and General Motors cases may be&nbsp;the best-known examples,&nbsp;but Chapter 11 bankruptcy is frequently used by companies large and small&nbsp;to sell assets&nbsp;through&nbsp;<a href="http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2008/08/articles/business-bankruptcy-issues/will-section-363-free-and-clear-sale-orders-survive-an-appeal-a-recent-appellate-decision-raises-new-doubts/">Section 363 sales</a>. The important intersection between bankruptcy and M&amp;A deals&nbsp;in today's business climate was recently made the focus of an article in the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, aptly called &quot;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124528268556425429.html">Barbarians in Bankruptcy Court</a>.&quot;</p>
<p>Although Section 363 sales are quite common, some distressed companies&nbsp;are able to&nbsp;complete an asset sale outside of bankruptcy. The sale may be made directly by the company, or the&nbsp;seller may actually be&nbsp;a lender foreclosing on its collateral under the <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/9/">Uniform Commercial Code</a>. In still other situations, the seller may be&nbsp;an assignee acting through a general&nbsp;<a href="http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2008/03/articles/the-financially-troubled-compa/assignments-for-the-benefit-of-creditors-simple-as-abc/">assignment for the benefit of creditors</a>&nbsp;under state law.</p>
<p>Regardless of the path chosen, the landscape of distressed asset purchases can be significantly different from that traversed by many traditional M&amp;A lawyers and, most importantly, their&nbsp;clients. Fortunately, one of my M&amp;A partners at <a href="http://www.cooley.com/">Cooley Godward Kronish LLP</a>&nbsp;with significant experience in distressed acquisitions, <a href="http://www.cooley.com/attorneys/bio.aspx?ID=33416003">Jennifer Fonner DiNucci</a>, has recently written an insightful article on the subject. Entitled &quot;<a href="http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/uploads/file/TransactionsWithDistressedCos.pdf">Balancing the Risks and Benefits of Transactions Involving Distressed Companies</a>,&quot;&nbsp;the article&nbsp;discusses the unique challenges -- and opportunities -- posed by distressed asset acquisitions. It also highlights some of the major issues that potential asset buyers&nbsp;encounter when dealing with a distressed seller, and points out key differences between&nbsp;distressed transactions and more traditional M&amp;A deals with&nbsp;solvent companies.</p>
<p>The article makes for interesting -- and timely -- reading for anyone considering a purchase of assets from a distressed company.</p><img alt="" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BusinessBankruptcyBlog/~4/iGJSEWbZcXk" /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
