<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ABI Bankruptcy Blog Exchange &#187; Tech Bankruptcy</title>
	<link>http://blogs.abiworld.org/</link>
	<description>ABI Bankruptcy Blog Exchange &#187; Tech Bankruptcy</description>
	<generator>Gregarius 0.5.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Bankruptcy: Chapter 11 Trustee appointed in SCO Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/08/chapter-11-trustee-appointed-in-sco.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:54:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/08/chapter-11-trustee-appointed-in-sco.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Every now and then I'm reminded that the SCO bankruptcy remains pending. You might recall SCO as the company that sued Novell and a number of other companies claiming that it owned copyrights to code found in the LINUX open source operating system. Almost two years ago, S<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2007/09/sco-files-for-chapter-11.ars">CO filed a Chapter 11 petition</a> in order to protect the company while the litigation continued. SCO is represented by Laura Davis Jones of Puchulski Stang Ziehl &amp; Jones, LLP.<br />In May, the U.S. Trustee's Office in Delaware filed a <a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/05/sco-to-fight-us-bankruptcy-trustees-motion-to-liquidate-it.ars">motion to convert</a> the long-standing Chapter 11 case to Chapter 7. Declining to institute such a drastic remedy, Judge Gross instead <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/SCOGBK-891.pdf">ordered </a>a Chapter 11 bankruptcy trustee appointed. More detailed information about the decision can be found <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090805144623275">here on Groklaw</a>. Although the order has not been appealled, a trustee has not yet been appointed.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Steven Vaughan-Nichols' blog in Computerworld <a href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/14597/the_sco_zombie_wins_one">reports </a>that SCO actually won a minor victory of sorts in its litigation with Novell, as the Court of Appeals reverses a prior summary judgment decision against SCO.<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7867776-80574630598364843?l=tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com' alt='' /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Tech Bankruptcy: Supreme Court Denies Cert in NCP Marketing Case - Kennedy and Breyer Signal Preference for Actual Test</title>
		<link>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/04/supreme-court-denies-cert-in-ncp.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:42:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/04/supreme-court-denies-cert-in-ncp.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	About a month ago the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in the NCP Marketing Case. A link to the denial is <a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/08pdf/08-463.pdf">here</a>. Robert Eisenbach provides a detailed analysis of why this is significant in a <a href="http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2009/03/articles/business-bankruptcy-issues/us-supreme-court-shows-interest-in-deciding-whether-the-hypothetical-test-or-the-actual-test-should-be-used-to-determine-if-ip-licenses-can-be-assumed-in-bankruptcy/">March 26, 2009, post</a> on his <a href="http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/">In the Red</a> Blog.<br />In a nutshell, the NCP Marketing case dealt with the ability of a debtor to assume a trademark license. The bankruptcy court held that the license had been terminated pre-petition, and therefore could not be assumed. It also stated, in dicta, (and in my opinion incorrectly) that the trademark license was not assignable as a matter of common law and therefore, under applicable law in the 9th circuit, not assumable. Appeals ensued and the decision was affirmed at each step. <br />What makes the denial of certiorari in this case interesting is that two justices, Kennedy and Breyer, felt the need to issue a statement on the matter. While they agreed that denial of certiorari was appropriate in this particular case, they welcomed the opportunity to hear a case on the issue of whether the actual test or the hypothetical test is the correct test for analyzing section 365(c). And, from Judge Kennedy's comments, it seemed likely that they would support adoption of the actual test.<br />I would note that these are only two justices and they are among those more likely to support the policy driven reasons for adopting the actual test as opposed to the strict statutory construction theories behind the hypothetical test. On the other hand, only four Justices are needed to grant certiorary and it seems likely that Kennedy and Breyer would not have signaled their interest in taking a case on this issue if they expected the outcome to go against their viewpoints.<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7867776-6776412481978618256?l=tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com' alt='' /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Tech Bankruptcy: Article on IP Licenses and Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/04/article-on-ip-licenses-and-bankruptcy.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:59:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/04/article-on-ip-licenses-and-bankruptcy.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Two Seattle bankruptcy lawyers, <a href="http://www.klgates.com/professionals/detail.aspx?professional=3563">Marc Barreca</a> of <a href="http://www.klgates.com/Home.aspx">K&amp;LGates</a> and <a href="http://www.cairncross.com/ourpeople/?id=87">John Knapp</a> of <a href="http://www.cairncross.com/">Cairncross &amp; Hemplemann</a>, recently teamed up to author <a href="http://www.klgates.com/files/Publication/e01b3daf-826d-41cf-92cb-0f00a233f568/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/2e5b1d2f-eeef-4ae6-a3b3-1285fafef51f/Intellectual_Property_Licenses_and_Bankruptcy.pdf">a useful article</a> on the current state of intellectual property licenses and bankruptcy.<br />The article provides an introduction to the basic legal issues. With each topic, the article lists a number of useful practice tips. The practice tips might be the best part of the article, since they are easy to understand (even when the underlying legal concepts are not), and provide practical, not legalistic, advice.  Some of these tips address issues relevant to the initial license negotiations, while others focus on what to do when the other party to the license actually files a bankruptcy petition.<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7867776-6621088422163898205?l=tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com' alt='' /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Tech Bankruptcy: Charter Communications</title>
		<link>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/03/charter-communications.html</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:41:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/03/charter-communications.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Cable giant <a href="http://www.charter.com">Charter Communications</a>, Inc. filed a chapter 11 petition on Friday in the Southern District of New York. According to the firm's <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=112298&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1270542&amp;highlight=">press release</a>, the company has already negotiated a restructuring plan, which it filed along with its other first day motions. <img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7867776-6862607119983994893?l=tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com' alt='' /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Tech Bankruptcy: Moving out: Azteca Mobile; Skyward Mobile; North American Scientific; Progressive Games</title>
		<link>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/03/moving-out-azteca-mobile-skyward-mobile.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:43:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/03/moving-out-azteca-mobile-skyward-mobile.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Mobile virtual network operator Azteca Mobile <a href="http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2209528/">filed a Chapter 7 petition</a> in Kansas City at the beginning of the month. Azteca sold prepaid phone cards for the Sprint Nextel network, and focused on the US to Mexico market.<br />Closer to my home, Skyward Mobile, LLC <a href="http://www.masshightech.com/stories/2009/02/16/daily38-Skyward-Mobile-files-Ch-7-bankruptcy.html">filed a chapter 7 petition in Massachusetts</a>. Skyward built mobile applications, including games, for use on cell phones.<br />Yesterday, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSN2051278120090320">Reuters reported </a>that Progressive Gaming International Corp., which makes technology products for the casino industry, filed a chapter 7 petition. The petition was filed in the District of Nevada. The bulk of its assets were apparently<a href="http://www.lvrj.com/news/breaking_news/41590457.html"> foreclosed on in January</a>.<br />Are you seeing a trend here? For all you real bankruptcy lawyers, all is not lost.<br /><br />According to the <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2009/03/12/ap6160595.html">Associate Press</a>, <a href="http://www.nasmedical.com/">North American Scientific, Inc.</a>, a provider of products and services for cancer treatment, filed a chapter 11 petition in the Central District of California on March 12. The company <a href="http://www.smartbrief.com/news/advamed/industryBW-detail.jsp?id=432C8D52-D6A5-43DB-B294-2B42478C3297">plans to reorganize</a>.<br /><br /><img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7867776-7593440519355677917?l=tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com' alt='' /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Tech Bankruptcy: Can't Gamble With Your Domain Names!</title>
		<link>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/03/cant-gamble-with-your-domain-names.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 03:36:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/03/cant-gamble-with-your-domain-names.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	In October I <a href="http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2008/10/dont-gamble-with-your-domain-names.html">reported </a>on a rather unusual decision by a Kentucky Judge holding that domain names were "gambling devices" under Kentucky law. In the case, Kentucky v. 141 Internet Domain Names, Judge Wingate considered a request by the Commonwealth of Kentucky that he order in rem seizure of several domain names under a state statute allowing seizure of gambling devices. Judge Wingate granted the request, finding that the domain names (which led to on-line gambling websites) were gambling devices, and that the state had in rem jurisdiction over the names despite the fact that the defendants, registrars and registries were all located outside the state. He ordered the relevant registries (most of the registrars being located outside the United States) to turn control of the domain names over to the Commonwealth of Kentucky.If you like to play poker online, you can now breath easy. On January 20, 2009, an appellate panel held in a four to one opinion that "it stretches credulity to conclude that" a domain name could be a gambling device under the state's statutory definition. Thus, the lower court lacked in rem jurisdiction over the domain names. Interactive Media Entertainment v. Wingate, 2009 WL 142995 (Ky App. 2009). One judge, more credulous that the others, disagreed, stating that the entire compilation of the gambler's computer, gambling site's computers, software and domain name constituted a gambling device and the court could exercise jurisdiction over just the domain name portion of the "device."The conclusion was clear enough though. You can't gamble with your domain name.<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7867776-8514801367309589424?l=tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com' alt='' /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Tech Bankruptcy: Customer data just goes out the door at bankruptcy auctions.</title>
		<link>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/03/customer-data-just-goes-out-door-at.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:51:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/03/customer-data-just-goes-out-door-at.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	CIO Magazine recently published <a href="http://www.cio.com/article/482187/When_A_Company_Folds_Who_Guards_Your_Data_s_Privacy_">an interesting article </a>about the sometimes loose treatment of business and customer data in liquidations. It talks about improper disposition of sensitive customer data and the habit of trustees and liquidators of auctioning off computers without first scrubbing them of data.<br />This kind of problem certainly exists. I'm personally aware of one case where a weight-loss franchisee's employee threw customer records in the trash without shredding them first, and a reporter found them. This resulted in an investigation by the state attorney general's office. In another case, the data back-up disks for the debtor's on-line website were in a cardboard box, in a corner, and disappeared during the course of the furniture and equipment auction. <br />With a failing business, data controls are fairly important. One of the items on the checklist definitely has to be identifying both sensitive data (such as payroll information and consumer information) and key data (such as financial information and asset related data) and developing a plan to ensure such data is properly preserved or disposed of, as needed.<br />The article includes a quote by <a href="http://www.larkinhoffman.com/our_people/Michael_Fleming.cfm">Michael Fleming</a>, a friend of mine who practices technology law in Minneapolis. Way to go Mike.<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7867776-4151340392576677360?l=tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com' alt='' /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Tech Bankruptcy: Failing Chip Makers and Others: Spansion, Visteon, Dynogen Pharmaceuticals</title>
		<link>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/03/failing-chip-makers-and-others-spansion.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:17:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/03/failing-chip-makers-and-others-spansion.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	On Sunday, chip maker Spansion, Inc. filed a chapter 11 petition in the District of Delaware, case number 09-10690. I haven't heard of them, but this is a big one - more than a billion in assets. Spansion is the world's largest manufacturer of flash memory solutions, particularly for cell phones. According to the <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/business/technology/story/927728.html">AP story</a>, Spansion's problems are related to the decline in demand for consumer electronics.<br />Crain's Detroit Business <a href="http://www.foreclosureinfotoday.com/2009/02/27/analyst-report-predicts-visteon-bankruptcy-filing-crains-detroit-business/">predicts</a> that Visteon will file for bankruptcy sometime before the end of April. <a href="http://www.visteon.com/products/">Visteon </a>provides technology and electronics systems for the automotive industry, so no great surprise there.<br />Last Monday, Dynogen Pharmaceuticals filed a chapter 7 petition in Massachusetts. <a href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2009/02/dynogens-chapter-7-filing-leaves-six-firms-hanging.html">Among the creditors</a>, about six law firms owed more than $250,000. Debtor's counsel received payments for about the same sum prior to filing the petition. Nice work for a chapter 7 case.<br /><br /><img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7867776-5059846846932668128?l=tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com' alt='' /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Tech Bankruptcy: More: Qimonda again,BroadRamp</title>
		<link>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/02/more-qimonda-againbroadramp.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:23:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/02/more-qimonda-againbroadramp.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	About February 20, 2009, Qimonda Richmond, LLC, and its parent, Qimonda North America Corp., filed chapter 11 petitions in Delaware. The docket number is 09-10589. I wrote about Qimonda <a href="http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/search/label/Qimonda">previously</a>.<br /><br />Online video delivery company, <a href="http://www.broadramp.com/">BroadRamp, Inc</a>., filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy recently, according to <a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/business/BroadRamp_files_for_Chapter_7_bankruptcy.html">My San Antonio</a>. I notice the website is still up and running. I also notice that they stopped issuing press releases back in April 2008. When a tech start-up stops issuing press releases it is usually a pretty clear sign that something is amiss with the cash flow.<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7867776-3735098543042061760?l=tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com' alt='' /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Tech Bankruptcy: Midway Games files Chapter 11</title>
		<link>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/02/midway-games-files-chapter-11.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:59:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2009/02/midway-games-files-chapter-11.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<a href="http://tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com/2008/12/tech-in-trouble-nortel-networks-midway.html">As predicted back in December</a>, Midway Games, Inc. filed its Chapter 11 petition on February 12, 2009, in Delaware. The case number is 09-10465. A maker of computer games available through retail outlets and on-line, Midway Games <a href="http://www.midway.com/us/pr/mpr_5591.html">claims in its press release</a> that its fundamental business is stable, but that obligations related to stock repurchase agreements forced it to seek Chapter 11. European operations will not be affected.<br /><br />A number of its titles, such as Mortal Kombat v. DC Universe depend on licensing deals and it will be interesting to see if Midway runs into problems assuming those licenses.<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7867776-3039125314840776158?l=tech-bankruptcy.blogspot.com' alt='' /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
